A Look Back at the Very Worst of the Gooker Winners!

29 Submitted by on Tue, 21 April 2020, 19:50
Former Rewriting The Book author Jon Milne wanted to jump in and give his two cents on the very worst of all the Gooker winners…so without further adieu, Jon take it away!

Even despite the massive public health crisis that has massively impacted the world recently, there’s been a great sense of déjà vu about the kinds of stuff we’ve witnessed in the wrestling industry this year, particularly in the WWE. We’ve already seen a Saudi Arabian PPV and a Wrestlemania PPV of dubious quality and morality, as well as more of Bray Wyatt being booked in very questionable fashion! I am already getting visions of the future of me clicking a little tick-box next to any one of those options and then hitting a “VOTE” button. Weird, right?

Happily, we’re not here today to discuss any of those as potential inductions, but instead, we’re here to discuss the “prestigious” award they will almost certainly be contenders in. WrestleCrap awarded its very Gooker Award all the way back in the year 2000, so named of course after the hilariously awful “Gobbledy Gooker” turkey gimmick as portrayed by Hector Guerrero. In January, WrestleCrap.com officially concluded the 20th edition of its annual Gooker Awards. That’s 20 years of Gooker Awards, with, heh, 21 winners of the award.

Of course, this begs the question: What, out of all of these winners, represent the True “Very Worst Of Wrestling”, to quote WrestleCrap’s tagline? Well, today, we’re going to find out and explore beyond the bottom of the barrel. I’m Jon Milne, author of the four-part Rewriting The Book story: “What If CM Punk Didn’t Return So Soon After Money In The Bank 2011?” which you can read in full here: https://www.wrestlecrap.com/more/rewriting-the-book-what-if-cm-punk-didnt-return-so-soon-after-after-money-in-the-bank-2011-part-iv/ , and we’re counting down…

The Top 10 Worst Gooker Award Winning Inductions Of All Time!

You know, with All Elite Wrestling currently producing actually pretty good content and providing a very credible challenge to NXT on Wednesday nights, as well as the increased profile of New Japan Pro Wrestling nowadays as a credible alternative to the WWE, you almost forget when another company, the formerly named Total Non-Stop Action Wrestling (now known as Impact Wrestling), attempted to compete with Monday Night Raw for 10 weeks, and did so badly they scored TNA the first of 3 Gooker Awards over the space of 4 years. I don’t know about you guys, but if I was wanting to creatively revitalise a company, I wouldn’t turn to the guys mainly responsible for killing WCW; and yet that’s exactly what TNA did when they turned to Eric Bischoff and Hulk Hogan (as well as their continuous fraternising with Vince Russo over the years) and it resulted in deserved failures all around. RD Reynolds and Justin Henry will probably never write a book about the Death of TNA, although they did a pretty good job in the epilogue of The Death of WCW, which incidentally is still available for purchase here! https://www.amazon.com/Death-WCW-R-D-Reynolds/dp/1536627313 [Editor’s Note: Insert witty RD comment here]

This induction is so bad that its spiritual sequel – this time starring Bobby Lashley and Liv Morgan alongside our two Russian leads! – came within only a couple handfuls of votes from pipping the Seth Rollins/Fiend Hell in a Cell match to the 2019 Gooker. Unusually for sequels however, I would still say that the original was the worst one. It’s so dispiriting to see just how far Rusev, Lana, and Ziggler all fell throughout this feud, especially since in late 2014 they had been the beneficiaries of some fantastic booking (Dolph at Survivor Series 2014, and Rusev/Lana being truly fantastic villains the crowds were invested in hating), and then they got lumbered with this seemingly endless crap. This tedious angle is one of the very few cases where you can actually feel thankful for the existence of a celebrity gossip rag like TMZ, whose announcement of Rusev and Lana’s real life engagement forced the entire angle to be nixed.

#8: Hornswoggle vs. Chavo (2009): https://www.wrestlecrap.com/inductions/5353/

You know what, however? I’m glad Rusev and Lana didn’t win again for last year, because I don’t think they even remotely deserve to be in the same company as the guy who is, to date, one of only two “named” wrestling personalities to win repeat Gooker Awards. I’m talking, of course, about Hornswoggle, and especially about this humiliation-fest that Chavo Guerrero Jr. was subjected to. I feel no hesitation in saying that Hornswoggle is, flat-out, my least favourite wrestler of all time, especially for the black mark he left on the legacy of the Cruiserweight Title until its eventual revival, and especially for this feud. I mean, yeesh, Chavo may never been as talented as his uncle Eddie was in the ring, but at least his “other” uncle Hector only had to be the Gobbledy Gooker character for a few months. Chavo was subject to this horrendous crap for an ENTIRE YEAR.

Is this the worst Wrestlemania of all time? Nah, Wrestlemanias 9 and 11 and 27 probably deserve that “honour” the most. And, I mean, there’s a fair amount of redeemable content on this show, like the Intercontinental Title Ladder Match, and most of the women’s title match. So why is this placed above Hornswoggle? Simple: because this goes beyond merely being a bad angle, rather it’s about what it represents, which is going to be a common theme throughout the rest of the picks on this list. Wrestlemania 32 was a SIX F*CKING HOURS LONG show full of mostly vacuous matches, a seemingly deliberate attempt to stick it to smarks by booking pretty much every fan favourite to lose their matches (like Sasha Banks, AJ Styles, the New Day, Dean Ambrose), one of the biggest examples of Brock Lesnar not caring and burying an opponent, the continuing over-reliance on part timers and retired guys (especially a McMahon seriously actually being given a Wrestlemania match against a well past-his-prime Undertaker), and the continued over-push of a guy in the main event that fans just weren’t invested in at all. The question is, what kind of attitudes go into creating a show like this?

How about the one where wrestlers who are demonstrably talented in the ring and on the microphone consistently see their pushes derailed, and end up becoming the victims of stop=start booking, because quite clearly they just haven’t grabbed for that Brass Ring enough. In fact, arguably things are even WORSE now than they were in 2014. How many times have we, as fans, felt incredibly frustrated as someone who we rooted for in NXT/New Japan/ROH/Impact/any other promotion ends up hitting the WWE main roster only to end up being subject to exactly the same inconsistent booking? Look at the Revival, at Shinsuke Nakamura, at Sami Zayn, at Bayley, at Sasha Banks, at Bray Wyatt, at the former Dean Ambrose – all wrestlers who we know are capable of having exceptional matches, and yet are criminally underused on the main roster. And even if you do get a sustained push, you can almost guarantee that the WWE’s main-roster booking will ruin it and completely take away your momentum, like with Kofi Kingston and Seth Rollins and Roman Reigns and The Fiend, to use some recent examples. Meanwhile, if you’re a part-timer, or someone coming back from retirement, or a McMahon, well this seems enough to qualify you for having grabbed the Brass Ring, and therefore you’ll get the main spotlight by default. And this is all because, much like WCW in its later years, the WWE only seems to care about short term profit as opposed to long term sustainability of its product. And nowhere is there a more egregious example of this than…

If this PPV consisted solely of its under-card, and took place in somewhere like the United States, or the UK, this would actually, in my view, be a better PPV than Wrestlemania 32. But of course, this card also includes the final three matches, which contain everything representing what I’ve been talking about in the past 2 entries: A McMahon hogging the spotlight by winning a tournament he didn’t even enter, a fan favourite (Braun) getting completely buried by a not caring performance by Lesnar, and finally, a bunch of an old guys in the main event embarrassing themselves with a truly terrible match absolutely on par with the kinds of crap matches you’d see featuring “old-timers” on episodes of Nitro. Of course, the worst part of this show is the fact the WWE even went through with it, even despite the extremely negative publicity for the event after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi by the authorities of Saudi Arabia. Watching the way top WWE officials attempted to justify their “tough” decision to go on with the event is truly laughable. Again, all WWE seems to care about is short-term profit, especially when it’s 10s of millions of dollars in Saudi blood money. The only reason this doesn’t crack the Top 4 is because Crown Jewel doesn’t quite yet have the “iconic” factor of the later inductions in this list. Perhaps, given a few years of more WWE Saudi events and another list in the future, its position may rise.

So we’re onto the Mount Rushmore of Wrestlecrap Gookers. Who made it?

Now there is a strong chance that I have, probably, rated this far too low. Thing is, I actually liked the Invasion PPV. I found the feuds and matches featuring Rock vs Booker T and Stone Cold vs Kurt Angle to be excellent, and I even like the climactic Survivor Series match that ended this angle, even despite the optics of it. But let’s make no mistake here: this angle was absolutely a petty, destructive, complete waste of what could have been a truly fantastic angle in wrestling. Instead, it mainly resembles a McMahon ego trip, one that was so happy that WCW was officially dead that it concentrated more on gloating over its corpse than trying to produce something special that would honour the good memories fans had of it. The refusal to sign the big names, the way particular WCW alumni were treated (like Diamond Dallas Page), and making the story all about the McMahons is completely indefensible. There are so many good examples of invasion angles throughout wrestling history, and the failure to learn from them is a massive indictment on this storyline and on the WWE.

#3: David Arquette, WCW Champion (2000): https://www.wrestlecrap.com/inductions/david-arquette-2000-gooker-award-winner/ (The Wrestlecrap 20th Anniversary Madness Tournament Runner Up!)

Regardless of anything the WWE might try and do in storylines with WCW alumni, NOTHING can be as bad as anything as what World Championship Wrestling did with them. To consider just how awful this Gooker winner is, think about the sheer mountain of crap WCW produced in the final year before its death: Judy Bagwell On A Pole, the San Francisco 49ers match, Viagra On A Pole, Sting On Fire, Spring Stampede 2000, Leather Jacket On A Pole, New Blood Rising, pretty much anything to do with Vince Russo… and yet, it is this burial of a once proud world championship, by putting it on a B-list actor as a reward for starring in a terrible WCW-produced movie, that ultimately won the first ever Gooker Award given by WrestleCrap. This angle is so bad, that even Arquette tried (unsuccessfully) to convince Russo to not book this angle, and he donated all money he made from his “career” in wrestling to the families of dead wrestlers. The Invasion may have been the final insult to WCW, but it can’t compare to the cancer that existed while WCW was still alive.

#2: Katie Vick (2002): https://www.wrestlecrap.com/inductions/katie-vick-2002-gooker-award-winner/ (The Wrestlecrap 20th Anniversary Madness Tournament Winner!)

Throughout the years, WWE have replicated numerous types of awful angles: failed “invasions”, feuds based on increasingly petty squabbles between “Divas”, commentators getting demeaned in some way, dwarf comedy, love triangles, terrible Wrestlemania events, racially insensitive storylines, characters that are meant to be scary but fall flat for whatever reason, and of course flirtations with oil-rich dictatorships. You know what they haven’t replicated in any storylines since this particular induction? NECROPHILIA. I mean, do I really need to say anything more about this? I don’t know what Glenn Jacobs, generally considered to be one of the friendliest people in the industry to interact with, did to deserve this huge black mark on his career. This angle was meant to boost ratings, but if anything, it actually contributed as a “final straw” for a good deal of people, including me, to make them quit watching wrestling. I, personally, would not get back into watching wrestling again until the second half of 2005, when a friend rekindled my love of wrestling with numerous DVDs of WWE from the Attitude Era and from the years I stopped watching, as well as also showing me stuff from other promotions, and where I become a massive mark for Edge and Shawn Michaels.

The only reason this is not in the #1 spot is because this repugnant angle only stretched to, like, a few weeks. And even though I didn’t quit watching because of my top pick, this was only because I was made of tougher stuff than I was 2002 and my friend intervened to persuade me, heavily reluctant though I was, to keep watching wrestling. So, what is the Worst Gooker Winning Induction Of All Time?

#1: Eddiesploitation (2006): https://www.wrestlecrap.com/inductions/eddiesplotation-2006-gooker-award-winner/

Whether it’s Michael Cole mocking Jerry Lawler for his dead mother, Paige mocking Charlotte Flair about Reid Flair, CM Punk and Paul Heyman mocking the Undertaker about Paul Bearer, or even Dean Ambrose mocking Roman Reign’s then-uncertain future after his leukemia diagnosis, easily the most repugnant type of angle any wrestling company can run is one where it exploits the deaths of others for cheap heel heat. And nowhere was this worse than with the WWE responding to the death of the legendary wrestler Eddie Guerrero on November 13th 2005, by running an over-a-year long storyline in which Rey Mysterio, Randy Orton, Mark Henry, Chris Benoit, and even Eddie’s own FAMILY MEMBERS Chavo and Vickie, were all used to exploit Eddie’s death in order to generate heat. Who can forget such FUN lines as “Eddie ain’t in Heaven. Eddie’s down there – in hell!” and “​I spit on the Guerrero name. I spit on you. And if your Uncle Eddie was alive, I’d spit on him too”? Apparently, this was an angle that everyone involved, as well as Hunter and Stephanie, hated, but Vince McMahon insisted on pushing forward. This, incidentally, was one of the last major angles Chris Benoit worked before his horrific death as a result of murder-suicide in 2007, with Benoit never being able to get over his grief from Eddie’s death, for which the WWE and it’s disrespecting of Eddie’s memory absolutely has to bear responsibility.

This induction is the only Gooker winner with a completely sombre tone on this site, with no wisecracks, no goofy pictures, no cringe-worthy soundbites, just a straightforward castigating of the WWE for such a disgusting angle. To me, there’s no doubt that nothing deserves to be named the Worst Gooker Winner Of All Time more than this. We still miss you, Eddie.

What do you think, those of you in the comments section? How would your lists look, and what would YOU say is the Worst Gooker Of All Time?

Written by

Yeah, you know...the WrestleCrap guy. Been here since before day 1, I have. You can hang out with me on Facebook. (I'm on there quite a bit) or follow my exploits on Twitter (I'm on there not quite so often). Thanks, and Keep on Crappin'!
29 Responses to "A Look Back at the Very Worst of the Gooker Winners!"
  1. Thomas Moffatt says:

    I’m glad to find out I’m not the only one who detests Hornswoggle. Definitely a floater in the history of wrestling…

  2. Brandon says:

    What’s so bad about Spring Stampede 2000? Granted its not a great PPV, but certainly better than most other WCW PPV offerings that year.

    • Jon Milne says:

      The “tournament” structure all in 1 night, as well as every match having a run in / interference angle. Madcow and the Wall were hideous, and the fact they were seriously actually trying to portray the New Blood as “villains”.

  3. Mike M. says:

    I’d say the burial of Ric Flair in the latter years of WCW have to count as a Gooker. Flair’s always had a good sense of humor about himself, I suppose, but it’s like nobody has really understood that I never want to see Flair buried. Oh, he can lose matches, sure. He can loser titles and feuds. But I never want him to not seem cool. I don’t want him in a mental asylum, no matter how hard he chews the scenery to get the idea over. I never want to see Eric Bischoff get one over on The Man. Never.

    • Jon Milne says:

      There is a good case for the introduction of what I’d call “Retro Gooker Awards”, for particular angles that were the worst of wrestling prior to the birth of WrestleCrap in 2000. You make a compelling case. Out of all the arenas WCW saw rapidly declining attendances at, the ones in “Flair country” were the most damning, the effect of continuously booking Ric badly in front of his home crowds.

      That said, were I giving Gooker Awards in the years prior to 2000, then 1999 would almost certainly belong to Heroes of Wrestling, with the Fingerpoke of Doom also a big contender. 1998 would surely go to the Hogan vs Warrior II feud, or Drunk Scott Hall. And 1997 I would almost certainly award to Starrcade 1997, for creating the conditions that led to the beginning of the end for WCW.

      • Dave says:

        “Retro Gooker Awards”– what a fantastic idea! I started watching around 1986– I imagine Wrestlemania II might have won it that year. 1987, maybe Outback Jack?

      • Mike M. says:

        Jon, I agree with you entirely.

        • Thomas Moffatt says:

          Yeah, it’s a good idea – though 1997 would be an unpleasant one. It would be the Melanie Pilllman interview in my opinion. Certainly not a fun induction, it was just so damn cruel and manipulative.

      • Morgan Wick says:

        Didn’t Art suggest that if the Gooker existed at the time it might have gone to Vince being the Higher Power when he inducted that angle?

  4. #OPC says:

    I’d probably put Clair Lynch in the top ten and move down the love trapezoid or Chavswoggle.

  5. Chris V says:

    I didn’t want to see Ric Flair lose to David Flair or Vince Russo and get his head shaved.
    I decided I wouldn’t watch WCW again after hearing about that burial of Ric Flair.
    I wasn’t watching WCW anymore by that point, but that was the final nail in the coffin.
    I’d give WCW another chance in January of 2001, but had to swear off the company again in March when everyone decided they should never have to watch WCW again.

    • Mike M. says:

      It is amazing. WWF/E always knew it could make more money by never humiliating its foundational stars. They cut ties with Hogan, sure, but never buried the man. WWE treated Flair better than WCW did in its last 3 years. Heck, Flair beat Vince in an I Quit match, wrestled the Undertaker at Mania and won the IC title and the tag titles with two different partners, all after his WCW run.

    • Jon Milne says:

      Unfortunately, the Gooker Awards never recognised anything done by or to Ric Flair, although certainly there’s arguable potential for his place in any “Retro Gooker Award” list for angles that took place before WrestleCrap was born. As such, Ric Flair wasn’t eligible for this list.

      I blame David Flair’s wrestling career entirely on Ric though. Nepotism in wrestling almost never turns out well.

  6. Marcus says:

    WTF? “This, incidentally, was one of the last major angles Chris Benoit worked before his horrific death as a result of murder-suicide in 2007, with Benoit never being able to get over his grief from Eddie’s death, for which the WWE and it’s disrespecting of Eddie’s memory absolutely has to bear responsibility.” Are you crazy? A man kills his family and you think WWE and a wrestling storyline bears responsibility? Stupid comments from a FAT, HIGH-PITCHED, LOSER!

    • Jon Milne says:

      So just in case your reaction is real and not trolling, you can watch the recent Dark Side of the Ring episode on Chris Benoit, many of Chris’s closest family, friends, and co-workers have also attributed Eddie’s death to Benoit’s massive decline in mental health due to him being completely unable to get past his best friend’s death. Considering the WWE ran an angle for an entire year consisting of disrespecting Eddie’s memory… it’s no wonder. Of course Benoit is to blame for killing his family, I never suggested otherwise. But do I blame the WWE for the conditions that led to his death, namely through lack of wellness testing, being incredibly complacent about the effects of repeated concussions, and a disgusting storyline that consisted of exploiting grief over Eddie’s death? Hell yes.

      • Mike M. says:

        You have nothing to explain or to apologize for here. No other workplace would treat the death of a colleague this way.

      • Mr. Boat says:

        Benoit alone bears responsibility for murdering his wife and son, which can and should be attributed to decades of steroid abuse and domestic violence long before a tasteless wrestling angle. Benoit was a grown man who willingly subjected himself to numerous things that exacerbated a bad situation until it boiled over into a horrible tragedy. If anything, WWE deserves to be held accountable for not realizing the kind of dangerous person they had on their hands and not shitcanning him when it came to light that he was a violent, unstable individual in 2003.

  7. Ben says:

    #1….that alone is the reason why I slowly lost my respect for WWE before finally abandoning it altogether after a few years.

  8. Jimbob Jones says:

    1) The Invasion. The turning point of WWE going from good to WWE sucking. That the two matches in your first couple of sentences were 3/4 WWE wrestlers should be testament to that.
    2) Mania 32. Sorry. 9, 11, etc were bad. But the 145-hour show that’s claim to fame was “a couple of things that didn’t suck” still doesn’t make it not the worst Mania ever.
    Point-blank: Wrestlemania 32 was the worst Wrestlemania ever.

  9. CF says:

    In case anyone has ever wondered Why Monopolies Are Bad: Look at what Vince McMahon did to pro wrestling when he got his monopoly in 2001.

  10. dennett316 says:

    Ah, the Invasion, the go to example for pointing out that Vince McMahon isn’t remotely close to being a ‘genius’, as some like to label him. He let his ego get the best of him and managed to fuck up the un-fuckupable in record time. Just quickly setting about showing that everything WCW was inferior to his company. He even got a second chance when they turned to ECW as the angle was floundering, only to immediately fuck THAT up by making it all about the McMahons.
    He left UNGODLY amounts of money on the table with his incompetence and drove away countless former WCW fans that never came back. The few big names who came across early on, giving up some sweet Turner pay to do so, got shafted with insipid booking (poor DDP). The ones that came later also were met with lacklustre handling, even as late as Sting’s eventual appearance in 2014, dragging up the old WCW shit when it had zero relevance to his storyline with HHH. It’s so bizarre that they only treated Goldberg properly when the man was well past his prime instead of in 2004 when it might have mattered more.
    It could’ve been years of intrigue and dream matches, instead it was a damp squib that did nothing to live up to fan expectations.

  11. WrestlemeElmo says:

    “This, incidentally, was one of the last major angles Chris Benoit worked before his horrific death as a result of murder-suicide in 2007, with Benoit never being able to get over his grief from Eddie’s death, for which the WWE and it’s disrespecting of Eddie’s memory absolutely has to bear responsibility. ”

    This is too much – you are disgusting. You should be absolutely ashamed of yourself.

    • Jon Milne says:

      So I already addressed this argument up above. I would invite you to watch the Dark Side of the Ring episode about Chris Benoit. Pretty much everyone agrees that a key component of Benoit’s deteriorating mental state was his inability to overcome his grief over the death of his best friend, Eddie. The WWE spent the best part of a year exploiting the death of Eddie for cheap heat, which would undoubtedly hinder any grieving process.

      You seem to believe that I think the WWE are responsible for the murders of Nancy and Daniel Benoit. I don’t, Chris is responsible for those actions. But the WWE are responsible for the conditions that led to his death, not least the fact that it wasn’t until after Benoit’s death that their policies on Wellness Testing and Concussion preventions (through bans on chairshots to the head among other things) were significantly updated, and the WWE was guilty of a massive dereliction of duty in not keeping track of the mental health of their performers (again, watch Dark Side of the Ring for testimony about how much Benoit changed in the years after Eddie’s death). What would be likely to greatly exacerbate any negative mental health feelings? How about a highly toxic year-long story-line which mocked the grief people felt over Eddie’s passing?

      Much like Marcus up above, I’m assuming you’re not trolling, but rather than throwing ad hominems around and jumping to the wrong conclusions, maybe you could try and engage the argument constructively?

  12. Presidente Clint says:

    Can we have a referendum and retroactively label the top 10 worst annual events/angles/matches of the 1990s under the Gooker banner? I feel that Hornswoggle should be the mascot of All Things Bad In The Noughties, and Dixie in turn represents the low points of wrestling in the 2010s.

    • Jon Milne says:

      I like the way you think! Not Dixie though, I’d choose a WWE representative due to how quickly irrelevant TNA become. I’d actually probably choose the Bella Twins to represent the 2010s, as a symbol of the struggles the women’s division had to go through in order to finally be considered worthy of being treated seriously in the WWE. Either that, or Vince McMahon, or Stephanie McMahon, or Baron Corbin.

  13. Van Daminator says:

    The sad reality of Eddiesplotation is that, well…it worked and the fans in attendance wanted it. People kept chanting for Eddie incessantly, even if he wasn’t brought up in any capacity. Yes, WWE prompted this by keeping Eddie as a part of the storyline, but it was the fans in attendance that enabled it to continue as long as it did. Just watch an episode of Smackdown in early 2006 and notice how much they chanted for Eddie in anything Rey Mysterio had involvement in. Had they rejected it, it probably would have stopped after the Royal Rumble. But sadly, the first rule of mass media is to give the people what they want, and what audiences wanted was Eddie to continue being a part of the storyline.

    We look back in retrospect to see how much in poor taste it was, but there simply wasn’t enough backlash at the time. On the contrary, it got over.

    On another note, I don’t think WWE bear absolute responsibility for pushing Benoit over the edge. It was no doubt a major influencer, but Benoit was having marital problems, as well as physical and mental health issues.

    I’m not a WWE apologist by any stretch btw, I think Crown Jewel and the Saudi Arabian deal generally is the worst thing they have ever done, given Saudi Arabia stone women to death who are raped, throw LGBT people from buildings to their deaths and are, as we speak, committing genocide in Yemen. I would sooner support another PPV in North Korea than Saudi Arabia.

  14. Unknown says:

    You know how bad the Eddiesploitation angle was? According to Konnan, even Stephanie and Hunter thought it was a bad idea and didn’t want to do it (and, given some of the ideas and angles those two have been involved in, that’s really saying something, IMO) but Vince was the one who wanted to do the angle…

    And, as others have pointed out, yes, Chris Benoit is responsible for his own actions the weekend he murdered his wife Nancy and son Daniel, but I wonder how being heavily involved in an angle that exploited his best friend’s death, as Jon Milne has pointed out, affected his state of mind (and Eddie was Chris’ closest friend, and the ONE person he could talk to–everyone agrees that, after Eddie’s death, Chris was never the same) in the months and weeks leading up to his horrific actions…

    Reportedly, Chris and Chavo were going to feud over Eddie’s “estate” (again, according to Konnan) but Chris FINALLY put his foot down and refused to do it anymore…

    Yeah, I’d say Eddiesploitation deserves #1…

    • Van Daminator says:

      I’m not defending the angle, I’m just saying I don’t think it’s a slam dunk #1. Bear in mind that this was inducted before the Benoit tragedy, and while I’m not saying it didn’t deserve to win in 2006, I think WWE knowingly partnering and covering for an autocracy that has a charted history of gross human rights abuses is worse. That took actual negligence and/or malice. And this wasn’t some diplomatic mission fronted by Antonio Inoki like Kollision in Korea either.

      Eddiesploitation, despite its marketing, I get there was some degree of good intent behind it, and the fans at the time got behind it. A lot of the decisions made were to make money, but there was some good will and intentions in honouring Eddie, they just went ridiculously overboard and the comments they had some wrestlers make were tasteless. I get why someone would put it at #1, but I think the WWE have done worse.

  15. Ben says:

    I had to LOL at the butthurt comments from those who don’t believe that WWE also had a hand in Benoit’s descent into a downward spiral. I bet these are the same people who want Benoit to be in the WWE Hall of Fame and wasting their time in wrestling forums about glorifying a murderer. Get over it, guys, the HoF is just a PR stunt and nothing else.

leave a comment